To A New Future

To A New Future

Rewriting the future of change

  • About the book
  • Jack
  • The Happiness Difference: Happiness Languages as Principles for Change

    • 23 May 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Whether change is something we initiate or how we adjust to changes in our world, making change happen takes courage and pragmatism, creativity and passion, collaboration and resiliency. Each of these are strengths that become more possible when we intentionally practice happiness.

    In any change process, we hold a handful of common intentions.

    • Changing how we define what matters
    • Changing how things happen and work
    • Changing how people engage and collaborate
    • Changing how people lead and take initiative
    • Changing how resources are shared and engaged

    These become more possible when people practice the prime happiness languages of appreciation, generosity, interest, lightness, and easy.

    Appreciation is thanking, savoring and visioning. Generosity is presence, sharing, and giving. Interest is exploring, learning, and experimenting. Lightness is spontaneity, informality, and humor. Easy is simplifying, uncluttering, and mindfulness.

    We can use each language as a principle that guides us in any change process. We look for ways to use these principles in how we research, design, organize, plan, build, test, launch, and scale change. Using the principles simply means raising them as questions and intentions in the conversations we have. The quality of our outcomes always reflect the quality of our conversations.

    When people aren’t practicing happiness in any change process, they’re instead whining, worrying, wallowing, waiting, blaming, excluding, resisting, assuming, arguing, bullying, evading, defending, competing, complaining, and complicating. This is why we observe how when people are unhappy they have the least capacity for initiating, participating in and contributing to positive change of any kind.

    The way we practice happiness trumps everything.

    It doesn’t matter if we have the right people, pressures, incentives, and resources at the table. It doesn’t matter how educated or wealthy people are or aren’t. Differences and similarities don’t necessarily matter either way. Nor does history guarantee anything in a largely unknowable future.

    What matters is the degree to which people practice happiness individually and collectively in the process of change.

    Fortunately, we now know that happiness can be learned. People can increase their happiness literacy and language fluency. They can learn about the abundant and emergent happiness research and applications. 

    The most interesting and profound shift is in their realizing how much happiness matters and how it can move from being situationally dependent to intentionally practicable. They discover that happiness doesn’t have to be a matter of chance when it can be a matter of choice.

    When people become more empowered in their capacity for happiness, they are more naturally engaged in positive change. When we want to make a difference, happiness makes the difference.

    • Tweet
  • Happiness Literacy

    • 17 May 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Even though the idea of literacy is usually sequestered to the realms of reading, it refers more broadly to knowledgeability.

    So we can talk about happiness literacy. This is knowing a bit about the neuroscience and social science research that demythologizes much about conventional assumptions about happiness. It also means developing some fluency in the happiness languages, the core of which include appreciation, generosity, interest, lightness, and easy.

    The research basics include understanding that the most accessible forms of happiness we have are practices that are best characterized as languages because they intentionally manifest happiness in its expression, the way language both expresses and evokes reality. It also outlines how happiness rewires our brains in ways that increase our set points. These are the baselines of happiness we return to soon after significant life events.

    Until people gain even basic literacy in happiness, their happiness is more chance than choice, more situationally contingent than intentional. More sustainable well-being begins with literacy. If we want a healthier, more engaged, and contributing society, it will always begin with all dimensions of literacy. Happiness will be core to this intention.

    • Tweet
  • How happiness makes collaboration more possible

    • 9 May 2012
    • 2 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Even though many organizations give fashionable lip service to collaboration, the future will belong to those who co-create it. Collaboration works when it is more a principle in practice than espoused value. Reality is that the future is abundant with possibilities that can only be realized in the intersecting space of many heads, hearts, and hands.

    We can collaborate globally and inter-nationally, politically and civically, professionally and personally. We can do together what no one can do apart, in isolation or opposition. Many of the most intractable and wicked problems around today will only become less relevant through new collaborations.

    It is not enough to insist or invite collaboration. It is also not enough to naively expect that putting people in common spaces or projects, no matter how sexy or significant, will automatically lead to collaboration.

    Collaboration is most natural for people who are happier together. It can happen with unhappy people, maybe, and when it does it is more difficult than it needs to be. We have long been constrained by the mythologies that good things should happen when people are not happy, and yes compliance and competition are possible in an unhappy environment.

    Collaboration is another story altogether.

    The key is to design happiness into the process up front. This means designing happiness principles into the quality of conversations that makes us more likely to be competitive of collaborative together.

    Engaging some of the happiness principles makes actual collaboration more possible. Here are examples.

    • Shared Resonance/ The quality of our relationships are always equal to the quality of stories we share that inspire us to be present with one another

    • Shared Dreams/ The scope and quality of new possibilities in the present are equal to the scope and quality of the possibilities we declare about the future

    • Shared Engagement/ People appreciate when power and responsibility are shared because people are most committed to that which they help decide and create

    • Shared Generosity/ Building relationships is accelerated by expressions of generosity in the form of shared resources, talents, and assets

    • Shared Learning / Our capacity for change is equal to our capacity for learning; when people cease inquiry, they cease their capacity for change

    • Shared Appreciation / When we savor our progress and achievements, we are energized to continue contributing to our common success

    These principles shape corresponding conversations that help collaborations start, grow, and mature because they design happiness into the process. Here are 6 examples.

    • What stories express what brings us together?
    • What matters to us and why?
    • What decisions can we make together?
    • What talents, knowledge, and resources do we have to share?
    • What can we learn together?
    • What are we most appreciative of achieving?

    These conversations, inspired by happiness principles, have the power to build collaborators that make a difference. They have the power to create bonds, align perspectives, and energize common action. They make it more possible for us to be happier together, which enables collaborations that work.

    These conversations work whether we have a small collaboration of two or three, or large collaborations of dozens, hundreds, or thousands of people. They are particularly useful when people come together as peers. And they work whether people are geographically located or work together virtually.

    As always, it’s about the power of the conversations, and in this model, it’s about the way happiness principles inform the possibilities of what we can do together.

    • Tweet
  • 16 Happiness Principles for Change

    • 3 May 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    In a world where change has become more and more inevitable and vital, why do some change efforts in organizations and communities succeed while others struggle? Why do some change efforts seem more destined for thrivancy and others for stuckness? Common folklore pins the tail of blame on the donkeys of inadequate leadership, resources or people’s capacity for resilience.

    As it turns out, the core difference between change efforts that flourish and those that flounder is in the working principles that inspire and inform them.

    We can assess the quality of any change we’re engaged in by the quality of the principles we’re working from. Our working principles are our narratives about what matters and what works.

    Working from the right principles shapes the conversations that engage people in change that matters and works. From a design perspective, the journey and destination are always about the principles we work from.

    Here are 16 working principles that make positive change more possible. They are happiness principles - principles based on the prime practices of happiness. They derive their power from the now well documented fact that the happier people are, the more adaptive and proactive they are with change. Each principle designs happiness into the process.

    We use these principles to organize all of our key conversations, planning efforts, and projects. We use them to shape how we engage diverse perspectives in alignment of passions and the engagement of strengths.

    1. Courage/ Passion for change is always equal to our sense of courage and courage is faith in ourselves and each other

    2. Strength-based focus/ The more we focus on our assets - our knowledge, talents, and connections - the more courage and wisdom we have to make any kind of change possible

    3. Engagement/ People appreciate when power and responsibility are shared because people are most committed to that which they help decide and create

    4. Gratitude/ Gratitude inspires optimism and a sustainable basis for the happiness that comes from generosity

    5. Declaring possibilities/ The scope and quality of new possibilities in the present are equal to the scope and quality of the possibilities we declare about the future

    6. Rewiring our brain for happiness/ The thinking and action habits we cultivate that welcome happiness change the structure of our brain in ways that make us more receptive to joy and joy makes us more interested in and receptive to change

    7. Celebrating progress/ Marking progress with storytelling creates personal satisfaction and shared resonance that inspires more momentum and collaboration

    8. Change resistance/ People do not intrinsically resist change, they resist change that excludes their gifts from being freely engaged

    9. Trust/ Trust becomes more possible in a context cultivated by generous sharing of knowledge, resources, and talents

    10. Generosity/ Building and restoring relationships is accelerated by expressions of generosity; generosity fuels the power of the commons, the spaces of accessible resources, talents, and assets

    11. Power of wow/ The most powerful inspiration of happiness for the happiest people on the planet is the joy of discovery, exploration, and learning

    12. The learning imperative/ Our capacity for change is equal to our capacity for learning; when people cease inquiry, they cease their capacity for change

    13. Agile organization/ we achieve optimum success when we work only on the most important things and keep our organization resilient to continuous change in our learning and environment

    14. Lightheartedness and creativity/ Ha-ha is the mother of ah-ha; ah-ha is the mother of wow; when work becomes play, more new possibilities engage and enliven everyone; some new possibilities are only visible through the lens of a smile, or from the whale’s belly of laughs

    15. Simple is an asset/ Simplifying the complicated energizes us with courage to take on more in the direction of the impossible

    16. Power of easy/ Making anything easier makes it more attractive and possible; there are fewer bonds stronger than simple and valuable

    • Tweet
  • The business of happiness

    • 1 May 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    This whole business of positioning happiness at the core of our success indices is grounded in the principle that happier people do better in life and work. Happiness also makes change easier and more impactful. Current research evidence tips overwhelmingly in favor of this perspective.

    Here are 10 qualities of people who are happier through the five prime practices of happiness: appreciation, generosity, interest, lightness, and easy.

    • They are energized by progress
    • They are more feel more grateful than entitled
    • They live and work with passion
    • They are more flexible and resilient to change
    • They learn and discover more
    • They share more of what and who they know with others
    • They are more generous and present with others
    • They are less intimidated by the difficult and impossible
    • They are easier to live and work with
    • They are more enjoyable to be around

    The less happy people are, the more they experience and exhibit alternative qualities:

    • They are more focused on what they don't have and can't do than what they do
    • They feel more entitled than grateful
    • They look for substitutes for happiness in incentives and proxies
    • They are sensitive and reluctant to change and novelty
    • They are attached to single narratives to the exclusion of learning
    • They expect others to be self-sufficient and not needing help
    • They protect what they have and see sharing as loss 
    • They postpone the difficult and resist the impossible
    • They are difficult to work and live with
    • They are always looking for heroes or scapegoats to their suffering

    Given this profile, making happiness a central indicator of personal and collective thrivancy promises to strengthen relationships in couples and families, communities and networks, organizations and social groups.

    Supporting the cultivation of happiness is about education. Period. It is about people becoming more literate in the practices of happiness, more knowledgable about the science now behind happiness, and understanding how to help make happiness a core success indicator in personal and collective contexts.

    • Tweet
  • The power & possibility of happiness indicators

    • 29 Apr 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    As it becomes more evident that conventional economic indicators have no power as proxies for indices of well-being, we are compelled to experiment with fresh sets of indicators.

    Based on my research for “The Joy of Thriving” here are five simple and powerful happiness indicators for any community, whether we talk about neighborhoods, organizations, networks, villages, and regions. Each manifests one of the five prime practices of happiness.

    The statements for each indicator represent examples of survey and interview items we can use to have people rate their experience in community. There are limitless ways for communities to use the happiness practices as design principles in scaling well-being toward the cultivation of happier communities.

    The five happiness indicators for taking well-being to SCALE:

    Storytelling/ the practice of appreciation … I know and tell stories of personal and local progress, achievements, and dreams

    Commons/ the practice of generosity … I am able to contribute to and make use of local available tangible and intangible assets

    Access/ the practice of easy … It is easy to navigate my community geographically and virtually

    Learning/ the practice of interest … I am able to learn from and teach others in my community

    Enjoyment/ the practice of lightness … I have diverse ways to have fun in my community

    The happier communities become, the more possible it is for the cultivation of sustainable entrepreneurship, local living economies, positive change, leadership, citizenship and communities that are more friendly in attracting and growing people and groups that add to community aliveness, meaning, and thrivancy.

    The happiness principle at work is simple and powerful: when people are happier, they have more faith in themselves and each other that translates into a community that more easily attracts and grows the kind of people and groups that lead to growing personal and collective well-being.

    • Tweet
  • Notes on A Unified Model for Change

    • 27 Apr 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    In this work in progress, “To A New Future: Rewriting The Future Of Change,” it’s interesting to dissolve the boundaries between what we call organizations, communities, and networks. Creating a coherent model for change suggests a unified approach to all three.

    Although they are useful distinctions, they mask the common threads of change requirements implied in each. In an intention of simplicity, we eschew the distinctions in favor of a singular approach. We don’t need a different model for organizations, communities, and networks.

    Different models at least tacitly support the idea of organizations that aren’t also communities, networks that also don’t act like organizations, and communities that are not also networks. The integration of the three gives each of them more power, and certainly fuses this power into a larger whole that encompasses and transcends their sum.

    So instead we can simply talk about these spaces as “where people come together.”

    This does not deny the customary differences among these three landscapes that play along several lines of dynamics:

    • How formal and informal power is centralized, distributed and manifest as positional authority, control over assets, expertise and knowledge, majority voice pressure, economics, and social influence

    • How much access people have to others, resources in the commons, learning, survival essentials, meaningful work, medicine, and transportation

    • How much freedom people have to dream of a future different from the past, take action on these dreams, and invite others into these actions

    • How people are bounded by formal and informal rules, laws, customs, regulations, incentive and cost systems

    In search of a unified model of change across these distinctions and dynamics, we work from a handful of simple and powerful principles:

    • Whatever structures exist today that were responsible for past successes might have no power to create a different future

    • People are capable of self-organizing amazing things when they share irresistible dreams

    • Personal and collective thrivancy is directly related to the quality and diversity of generosity and reciprocity connections between and among people

    • Happiness is the highest principle behind every individual and common well-being indicator we use to measure thrivancy on any scale

    These principles make it less necessary for us to labor around the jargon of structures and roles, as in references to organizations, communities, networks, leaders, employees, citizens, officials, consumers, and the like. Instead we more simply talk about people who have what they love to see and what they have to engage in creating the future they wish to see.

    People are more free to create and connect in change when they are not distracted or encumbered by hyperconcern with structures and roles. This leaves people who are assigned, elected, or self-appointed stewards of structures and roles to continue supporting continuities with the past by defending and protecting them.

    When we are committed to change, we don’t care if our context is called an organization, community, or network. We’re about change and that’s what matters.

    Organizations, communities, and networks have several features and functions in common that can distract from the simple intentionality of creating and connecting in change:

    • There are always people who want to be in charge, lead, and control things whether formally or informally

    • There are always assets that exist in the commons, that must be competed for, and that are protected from access

    • There are always documented and undocumented political, social, financial, and sanctioned lines that are only crossed at some costs

    • There are always what are normatively considered the right and wrong ways to do things and get things done and people who like to spend time reminding people which is when

    And that’s just how it is. Our focus is change and that’s where we put our attention, focus our aspirations, and engage our assets.

    • Tweet
  • Growing Local Food Webs

    • 16 Apr 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    One of the most promising trends in local living economics is the growth of local food webs.

    Food webs are the social, economic and cultural ecosystems that give rise to food as central to local thrivancy. Local means neighborhoods, villages, cities, and regions.

    The business case for local food webs is systemically multidimensional. Locally grown food is a direct and measurable route to health care, jobs, lifelong learning, resource engagement, and community building. It is the alternative to food deserts, manufacturing and service job declines, the difficult to employ, and the immense loss of local dollars to non-local food suppliers.

    There are four kinds of contributors to local food webs: cultivators, consumers, catalysts, and connectors.

    • Cultivators bring harvest to markets. They include rural and urban farmers and gardeners.
    • Consumers buy products from cultivators. They include retail, commercial and institutional.
    • Catalysts build grower capacity. They include suppliers, investors, educators and transporters.
    • Connectors bridge people and groups. They include network weavers, storytellers, and markets.

    Growing food webs means growing the scope and collaborations among each four kinds of contributors. Because of the symbiodependencies among each kind of contributor, any growth in one leads to growth in others. Food webs are opportunity and asset commons, distinctly different in form and function from free markets where growth in any contributor sector doesn’t necessarily lead to the growth in others, and can even work to reduce other sectors.

    Three simple and powerful ways to grow local food webs include initiating small projects, convening cross-sector events, and starting a learning sharing website.

    Small projects create new collaborations resulting in unlimited possibilities of new distribution channels, new growing technologies and methodologies, new product markets, and new education strategies.

    Cross-sector events can engage people in the open space of identifying assets, opportunities, and projects. These can cross contributor sectors, geographic sectors, and industry sectors. They can be large or small scale, stand-alone or ongoing events, empowered by network weavers.

    Learning sharing websites host the posting and sharing of professional and peer-to-peer education and training videos, podcasts, and articles. It becomes a valuable self-organizing commons for building capacity and connections.

    • Tweet
  • Beyond Mission-Vision-Values: Creating Compelling Futures

    • 5 Apr 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    The Future, As It Was

    When it comes to how organizations give lip service to their future, there is no higher exemplary best practice than the classic trinity of “Mission-Vision-and-Values.”

    On paper, they are supposed to be the ultimate guide to an organization’s universe. In practice, they remain relatively benign binder and wall ware. No matter how many countless mind-numbing hours executive teams labor to wordsmith them into perfection, on any given day in the real world, they are the north stars shining in irrelevance above the din of a team busy trying to build their plane as they fly it.

    They typically follow very simple formulas. Mission statements declare: “We provide quality products and services to our markets.” Vision statements promise: “We will be the leader in our markets.” Values statements pronounce: “We are dedicated to profitability to shareholders (compliance to funders), the highest quality to our customers (clients), and becoming employer of choice.”

    At best, these are self-evident platitudes that only require a simple cut and paste under the name of the organization. They are high in affective sizzle and low in actionable substance. They are blinding flashes of the obvious designed to reassure people that the organization is “clearly on track.”

    Many people also like them because they are intentionally obtuse, and as such, they relieve people of actual accountability that would otherwise require actionable metrics. They give the appearance of iron clad alignment across the organization.

    The cost of vagueness is the sacrifice of authentic consensus. Their vagueness means that 100 people can literally translate any of them in hundreds of different ways which would create more conflict and discomfort than any single minded leaders would tolerate. The fact that we do not elicit much less debate these hundreds of valid interpretations gives life to the illusion of consensus that generalizations easily create.

    That’s why, after we endure the ritual of consecrating our Mission-Vision-And-Values, we carefully relegate them to slow death by binder, wall ware, and slide decks where they will continue to have no power to inform and inspire conversations and actions that make a difference.

    The Powerful Alternatives

    The alternative is a focus on possibilities, principles, and projects.

    Possibilities are statements about the future we desire to create together. They are lenses that reveal new opportunities in the present we would never see without these lenses. They naturally grow and evolve as our learning and our world changes.

    They are specific statements of what we would love to see possible for our markets, our organization, and ourselves. They intrinsically express and evoke passion and authentic commitment and as such function completely differently than shallow and hollow “vision” statements that are usually generated.

    Here are some examples.
    • We engage the crowd sourced ideas of our customers to design and develop the products and services we provide to them
    • Our people are known in our industry as among the most knowledgable in our space
    • We come out with a new product or service every two years that surprises the imagination of our markets
    • People leave work with more energy than perhaps they came in with
    • People who work in the organization feel a fairly strong sense of meaning and freedom in their work and this inspires them to engage their best every day

    There are two principles at work with regard to possibilities. The more we engage everyone in contributing to them, the more passion there is in the organization. And, the more possibility statements we have, the better they get, meaning more actionable, specific and evocative of commitment and alignment.

    Principles are specific and actionable statements that describe what matters and what works relative to the business the organization is in. They provide unambiguous guidelines for anyone’s decisions and behavior. They are articulated as logical cause-effect and when-then statements. They are empowering and engaging, causing thinking rather than reacting.

    Here are some examples.

    • The words we use to describe ourselves to our markets never have the power of the stories our customers tell about us.
    • It is easy to spot customers who not value a relationship with us; they are the ones who only talk about price and their interests
    • People naturally support what they help create
    • People want to work for organizations when they believe are more interested in their strengths and passions than their expendability.
    • When people become happier, they are more passionate and productive.

    In many organizations, principles are far more difficult to create because they have the definitive character of authentic substance, accountability, and measurability. They speak to what matters and what works in our context. Because they are actionable, they effectively guide conversations about what business we are and should be in, what we want our future to look like, and what characterizes the quality of our actions. When they cease to be true, relevant, and actionable, we swap them out for ones that are.

    When organizations get stuck, they do not lack mission-vision-and-values. What they don’t yet have are relevant and meaningful principles. The presence and use of effective principles is one of the most profound differences between stuck and thriving organizations.

    It is easy to spot organizations that do not work from principles. Decisions are made by reactive convenience, the tyranny of personalities, and the hubris of arrogant assumptions that preserve some status quo. Blame for the organization’s stuckness is projected onto external forces. And the stuckness continues because without shared principles, people act in siloed and competitive ways that prevent the coherence of alignments. In this world, “leadership” which is actually management is required because people don’t have actual principles to work from.

    The third element is projects.

    Quick-payback projects and longer-payback projects translate possibilities through principles into a future that works.

    The two prime genres of projects are learning and launching projects. Learning projects focus on research, piloting, and prototyping. Launching projects focus on new initiatives, up scaling, and implementations.

    Possibilities and principles come alive and become realized in projects that engage what we have to do what matters and works. Without defined projects, all talk about mission, vision and values are lip-service. Projects inspired by possibilities and informed by principles allow us to transcend business as usual in creation of new outcomes.

    Together, the integrative power of possibilities, principles, and projects give organizations a passionate focus, measurable accountability, and high engagement traction that creates thrivancy. They form an interesting trifecta alternative for organizations seeking a future different from the past.

    • Tweet
  • The Happiness Imperative for Leaders

    • 19 Mar 2012
    • 1 Response
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    We now have evidence that happier people lead to higher levels of passion and engagement at work. Happier people also lead to happier customers and clients. And happiness at work spreads into the rest of people’s health, relationships, life, and well-being.

    Leaders in organizations, formal and informal, are uniquely positioned to cultivate a happiness-friendly organizational culture.

    Life in the Old Days of Happiness Illiteracy

    Before we had the compelling and growing body of research on happiness we have today, happiness was considered to be a byproduct of genetic predispositions or circumstantial variables. The old narrative placed happiness outside the actionable domains of intention and learning.

    In this world, the most a leader could hope for is being given enough surrogate resources to literally “compensate” people for their intrinsic and intractable unhappiness. This is the model that has been the foundation of the current state of organizational happiness. In the US alone, the 75% of employees who are mostly unhappy at work costs over $300 billion annually.

    The New Happiness Imperative

    Thanks to the emergence of happiness research over the past decade, we have come a long way in understanding the neuroscience of happiness and the practical and empowering implications.

    We now know that happiness is a practice. It is a function of how we focus and engage in our world. And as such, happiness can be learned and cultivated. It is an intentional possibility and actionable strategy when we know how to make it actionable.

    In “The Joy of Thriving” we talk about five prime practices of happiness that makes happiness more accessible anywhere anytime: appreciation, generosity, interest, lightness, and easy. Each has the power as a principle of practice to transform leadership.

    Transformed leadership creates happier organizations because it designs conversations and practices that invite the practices of happiness. The evidence is now clear: happiness is a choice of how we focus and engage in our world; it can be learned and developed; and it has profound implications for personal and collective thrivancy.

    The Possibilities of Transformed Leadership

    Here is an introduction to some of the possibilities.

    Appreciation We can begin or end meetings with people telling success and progress stories featuring explicit appreciation for contributors to each scenario. We can schedule time for people to regularly email or text thanks to someone who has made their life in any way easier or better. We can invite people to design beauty into their work spaces. We can regularly invite people to share their vision for their work group’s impact.

    Generosity We can set a practice expectation that everyone in our group spends up to a specific percentage, like 5%, of their week giving someone else help and receiving help from others in the organization. We can make some of our spaces and resources available to people in other work groups. We can set the expectation that everyone will weekly do some random act of kindness for someone else.

    Interest We can ask everyone to set quarterly new learning targets and give people time to share their gains. We can sustain accessible talent directories for anyone looking for peer2peer learning. We can translate all performance and outcome measures into learning measures that we share as a work group. We structure every meeting and presentation with participant inquiries and questions, which is to say shift from an information push to pull model, to build a vibrant and relentless culture of curiosity.

    Lightness We as leaders can model a healthy sense of humor and perspective. We can have regular half-days where everyone goes outside the organization to explore and play with something or someone new. We can create and utilize physical and virtual water coolers for impromptu conversations that make strategic serendipity more possible. We can actively encourage the ha-ha as provocation to the ah-ha.

    Easy We can consistently engage people in simplifying anything: systems, decision making, and access to resources. We can use simple and easy as design principles in designing every aspect of what we produce and how we produce it including how research, communication, learning, and accomplishments occur. We can teach people how to have easier conversations, organize projects and time more easily, and make their happiness at work more contagious to the rest of their lives.

    The Call for Change

    It takes a whole new kind of leadership to create happier organizations. Current practices, even those deemed unquestionable, are yielding high levels and costs of unhappiness at work. We have sufficient data demonstrating that. There is no evidential support for conventional leadership practices that naively expect performance to exceed attitude.

    Fortunately, making the transition doesn’t require expensive investments in capital improvements. Happiness is a practice not a purchase. It starts with giving formal and informal leaders in organizations new levels of happiness literacy. Leaders will care about happiness indicators in their organizations in an actionable way at the rate they are exposed to the compelling research on happiness that invites practical everyday implication possibilities.

    The new research profoundly holds old management practices and perspectives directly accountability for the fact that worldwide, according to Gallup’s annual research, fewer than 20% of employees feel the happiness of daily engagement of their strengths by their employers. And recent studies indicate that the vast majority of managers are equally unaware of this reality, the costs of it, and the way forward.

    The way forward is educating leaders so they discover and deploy the power to create happier organizations where, at the end of the day, everyone gains.

    • Tweet
  • « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next »
  • About

    10-time author and designer with a focus on change in organizations and communities. HappinessChoice.com. Contact Jack at jack(at)happinesschoice(dot)com

    3694 Views
  • Archive

    • 2012 (39)
      • May (10)
      • April (7)
      • March (6)
      • February (8)
      • January (8)
    • 2011 (118)
      • December (23)
      • November (2)
      • October (13)
      • September (9)
      • August (9)
      • July (12)
      • June (49)
      • May (1)

    Get Updates

    Subscribe via RSS